Methodology

Independent rankings, with the math shown

PsychicWho tracks 242 advisors across 3 platforms (Kasamba, Keen, Purple Garden) and scores every one with the same published formula. Every profile links to an in-depth editorial review — 242 already verified this cycle.

How we rank

Ordering. Lists follow platform popularity: cumulative completed readings from the official platform snapshot (2026-09-02, covering Purple Garden and Kasamba). Advisors without popularity data — e.g. all Keen profiles — follow, ordered by composite score.

Composite score. Every advisor gets one score (0–10):

composite = 0.6 × ratingScore + 0.2 × volumeScore + 0.2 × activityScore

ratingScore — the platform rating, Bayesian-smoothed toward the directory mean with a 25-review prior: (rating × reviews + mean × 25) ÷ (reviews + 25), mapped 1★→0, 5★→10. A 5.0★ profile with three readings cannot outrun a 4.9★ profile with tens of thousands.

volumeScore — review count, log-scaled 0–10 against the largest profile in the directory. Unknown counts get a neutral 4.0.

activityScore — freshness of the profile's last review: 10 (≤7 days), 8 (≤14), 6 (≤30), 4 (≤90), else 2. Unknown gets 5.0.

The composite score orders advisors without popularity data and powers the match quiz; the popularity ordering reflects what readers are choosing on the platforms right now.

Ranking lists also apply a platform-diversity rule: no platform may hold more than 2 consecutive positions.

What this site is — and isn't

Corrections

Platform data changes; scores update automatically. If a profile fact is wrong, contact hello@psychicwho.com and we will re-verify against the platform.